Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via توقعات كورة) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Open the market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Open the market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Open the market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Open the market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Open the market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Game Handicap: GZ (-1.5) vs Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks Gaming (+1.5) | 100% |
| Game Handicap: GZ (-2.5) vs Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks Gaming (+2.5) | 100% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 100% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 100% |
| First Blood in Game 1? | 100% |
| First Blood in Game 3? | 100% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 91% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 90% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 90% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 90% |
| Game 4 Winner | 51% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| First Blood in Game 4? | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 10% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 10% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 10% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 10% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 10% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 2% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 1% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 1% |
| First Blood in Game 2? | 1% |
| Game 1 Winner | 0% |
| Game 2 Winner | 0% |
| Game 3 Winner | 0% |
| Match Winner | 0% |
| O/U 3.5 Games | 0% |
| O/U 4.5 Games | 0% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 0% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 0% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 0% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 0% |
Market context
Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks Gaming and Ground Zero Gaming meet in an LCP Group Stage best-of-five, with the market already pricing a complete Ground Zero upset at 0% YES. That is consistent with the recent head-to-head: Fukuoka have won all three meetings in 2026, including a 2-0 in April and a 3-1 in February, so the historical baseline is strongly one-sided even before accounting for map spread in a BO5[1][14][17].
The more relevant current form, though, is less clean. Both sides entered the split with poor recent records, and Strafe’s form snapshot shows each team winless across its last five matches, with Ground Zero slightly higher in the LCP standings but still behind Fukuoka in the direct matchup trend[1][3]. That makes the live read less about broad season strength and more about whether Ground Zero can translate their slightly better table position into a first series win over a familiar opponent[1][6].
For traders, the main catalysts are roster and schedule confirmation around the August 6 start time, plus any late change to the BO5 staging or official match page. The market description itself allows a void if the series is not played, tied, or delayed beyond seven days, so any broadcast delay or rescheduling matters as much as team news. No injury, suspension, or emergency line-up issue is visible in the supplied sources, so the line is likely to move most on confirmed starting line-ups and whether pre-match reports point to either team changing players from the recent meetings[5][16].
Methodology
Football-specific comparison page for توقع: LoL: Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks Gaming vs Ground Zero Gaming (BO5) - LCP Group Stage. Polymarket's live quote (Polygon order book) plus platform attributes for the three reference venues. Sports markets reward liquidity — Polymarket and Betfair are materially deeper than Kalshi (US-focused) or Manifold (play-money).
Resolution & payout
Sports markets typically settle on official final-whistle plus league confirmation. Polymarket uses UMA Optimistic Oracle with a source URL per contract — usually official league data feeds or ESPN/Soccerway. Two-hour dispute window, then smart-contract payout in USDC.
FAQ
- Are prediction markets better than sports betting?
- Prediction markets tend toward tighter odds than bookmakers because they use peer-to-peer exchange rather than bookmaker margin. On major matches, Polymarket quotes typically sit 2-5% closer to the true probability model than bet365 or DraftKings.
- Can I bet on individual matches?
- Yes, Polymarket lists every major Premier League / Champions League / World Cup match as its own market. Liquidity varies — top matches like El Clásico or a semi-final often have six-figure pools, lower-league games closer to three-figure.
- What are live sports odds on Polymarket?
- Some top-tier matches stay open during play — you can trade the half-time probability in the 70th minute. Polymarket mid-prices update second-by-second; any frontend mirroring the order book shows the same movement.
- Which sports markets are available?
- Football (soccer) dominates — Champions League, World Cup, Premier League, La Liga, Bundesliga — followed by NFL, NBA, tennis Grand Slams, Formula 1, boxing/MMA. Resolution via official league source confirmation.
- What's the difference between match odds and outright odds?
- Match odds cover a single game ("Bayern beats BVB"). Outright odds are long-term aggregates ("Bayern wins the league"). Outright markets have deeper liquidity; match markets have faster resolution.
Trade توقع: LoL: Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks Gaming vs Ground Z… on توقعات كورة
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →