🎁 New traders: 100% Deposit Match up to $500 · 0% fees · instant USDC payoutsClaim it →
Skip to main content
HomeGuideCryptoMarketsBlogOpen the market →

توقع: Lincoln: Matthew Forbes vs Bernard Tomic

How the prediction market is pricing "توقع: Lincoln: Matthew Forbes vs Bernard Tomic" right now — Polymarket mid plus comparison with Betfair and Manifold.

Completed Match 100% Lincoln: Matthew Forbes vs Bernard Tomic Set 1 O/U 8.5 100% Lincoln: Matthew Forbes vs Bernard Tomic Set 2 O/U 8.5 100% Lincoln: Matthew Forbes vs Bernard Tomic Match O/U 21.5 100% Volume: $101K Closes: 24 Jul 2026
Open live market →
توقع: Lincoln: Matthew Forbes vs Bernard Tomic

Platform comparison

PlatformYES oddsNO oddsFeeKYCSettlement
Polymarket (via توقعات كورة) Pick
polygram.ink (preferred broker)
100% 0% 0% (USDC on-chain) No-KYC up to $1,500 USDC, auto via UMA oracle Open the market →
Polymarket (direct)
polymarket.com
100% 0% 0% Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU USDC, on-chain Open the market →
Kalshi
kalshi.com
Up to 7% per trade US-only, KYC required USD Open the market →
Betfair Exchange
betfair.com
2-5% commission Full KYC from first trade GBP / EUR Open the market →
Manifold Markets
manifold.markets
Play-money (mana) None — play-money Mana (no cash-out) Open the market →

Outcome probabilities

Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.

OutcomeProbability
Completed Match100%
Lincoln: Matthew Forbes vs Bernard Tomic Set 1 O/U 8.5100%
Lincoln: Matthew Forbes vs Bernard Tomic Set 2 O/U 8.5100%
Lincoln: Matthew Forbes vs Bernard Tomic Match O/U 21.5100%
Lincoln: Matthew Forbes vs Bernard Tomic Set 1 O/U 9.5100%
Lincoln: Matthew Forbes vs Bernard Tomic Set Handicap +/-1.5100%
Lincoln: Matthew Forbes vs Bernard Tomic Set 1 O/U 10.5100%
Lincoln: Matthew Forbes vs Bernard Tomic0%
Lincoln: Matthew Forbes vs Bernard Tomic Set 2 Winner0%
Lincoln: Matthew Forbes vs Bernard Tomic Set 1 Winner0%
Lincoln: Matthew Forbes vs Bernard Tomic Total Sets: O/U 2.50%
Lincoln: Matthew Forbes vs Bernard Tomic Set Handicap +/-1.50%
Lincoln: Matthew Forbes vs Bernard Tomic Set 2 O/U 9.50%
Lincoln: Matthew Forbes vs Bernard Tomic Match O/U 22.50%
Lincoln: Matthew Forbes vs Bernard Tomic Set 2 O/U 10.50%
Lincoln: Matthew Forbes vs Bernard Tomic Match O/U 23.50%

Market context

Matthew Forbes and Bernard Tomic are scheduled to meet in a professional tennis match at the Lincoln event on 17 July 2026. The 0% implied probability on Forbes reflects the substantial gap in playing experience and ranking between the two competitors. Tomic, an Australian with ATP ranking history and multiple Grand Slam appearances, holds a significant career advantage over Forbes, whose professional profile remains considerably less established. The settlement window extends to 24 July, allowing a seven-day buffer for fixture rescheduling before resolution defaults to 50-50.

Historical context for Tomic's matchups against lower-ranked opponents shows inconsistent results across his career. Whilst Tomic has defeated numerous players ranked outside the top 100, he has also suffered unexpected losses to qualifiers and unseeded competitors, particularly when motivation or form dips. Forbes' lack of ATP-level exposure makes direct comparison difficult, though the probability market has essentially discounted his chances entirely. This suggests traders view the pairing as heavily weighted toward Tomic's favour based on ranking differential alone.

The critical catalyst remains confirmation of both players' fitness and entry status. Any withdrawal announcement—particularly from Tomic, who has occasionally pulled from lower-tier events—would trigger resolution complications. Weather disruptions affecting the Lincoln schedule in mid-July could also delay proceedings beyond the seven-day threshold. Traders should monitor the ATP Challenger circuit updates and official Lincoln tournament communications for lineup confirmations closer to the scheduled date, as late changes are not uncommon at this tier of professional tennis.

Methodology

Football-specific comparison page for توقع: Lincoln: Matthew Forbes vs Bernard Tomic. Polymarket's live quote (Polygon order book) plus platform attributes for the three reference venues. Sports markets reward liquidity — Polymarket and Betfair are materially deeper than Kalshi (US-focused) or Manifold (play-money).

Resolution & payout

Sports markets typically settle on official final-whistle plus league confirmation. Polymarket uses UMA Optimistic Oracle with a source URL per contract — usually official league data feeds or ESPN/Soccerway. Two-hour dispute window, then smart-contract payout in USDC.

FAQ

When do sports markets resolve?
Typically within hours of the official final whistle. Polymarket uses UMA Optimistic Oracle with source URLs pointing at official league data feeds — e.g. the Premier League for EPL markets, UEFA for Champions League, FIFA for World Cup.
Can I bet on individual matches?
Yes, Polymarket lists every major Premier League / Champions League / World Cup match as its own market. Liquidity varies — top matches like El Clásico or a semi-final often have six-figure pools, lower-league games closer to three-figure.
What are live sports odds on Polymarket?
Some top-tier matches stay open during play — you can trade the half-time probability in the 70th minute. Polymarket mid-prices update second-by-second; any frontend mirroring the order book shows the same movement.
How fast do sports winnings settle?
Once the official league outcome is logged in the UMA Oracle (typically 1-2 hours after the final whistle), Polymarket's smart contract triggers USDC payout. To your wallet within minutes.
What's the difference between match odds and outright odds?
Match odds cover a single game ("Bayern beats BVB"). Outright odds are long-term aggregates ("Bayern wins the league"). Outright markets have deeper liquidity; match markets have faster resolution.
and

Trade توقع: Lincoln: Matthew Forbes vs Bernard Tomic on توقعات كورة

Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.

Open live market →

Related Topics

Tennis Prediction Markets